Courtesy Hartford Courant, Josiah H. Brown All content is copyrighted and may not be republished or
distributed without permission. |
Published: |
Wednesday, June 28, 2006 |
Edition: |
STATEWIDE |
Page: |
A11 |
Type: |
OPINION |
Section: |
EDITORIAL |
Source: |
JOSIAH H. BROWN |
|
|
|
|
|
MARRYING CULTURES Global
integration is personal for our family. My
parents married 44 years ago this month. My mother was a German immigrant
from a Lutheran background, my father a New Yorker of Jewish descent. In
Germany, my mom's father had been an aeronautical engineer and test pilot
under the Nazis. My dad's father was an observant Jew. Despite these
differences, my parents' relationship has thrived. In
2004, I married a woman from India whom I'd met in Connecticut. Her family is
Muslim. Months later, my brother married a woman he'd met in India; she is
Hindu. Not
everyone in my wife's family -- having sought an arranged marriage for her --
rejoiced over our union. Three uncles have yet to acknowledge it. Still,
most of her family embraced me. Our wedding combined Indian and Western
dress, Indian food, poems by Emerson and Tagore. We had receptions in New
Haven and New Delhi. A happy
consequence -- and a cushion -- of increasing globalization will be more
global families. Call this intimate diplomacy. Countries including the United
States and Canada have long prospered through immigration. Further weaving
together the planet's continents and citizens should be our aim. Love and
marriage -- the deepest forms of trade and investment -- complete the
tapestry. Scholars
such as Orlando Patterson advocate marriage across cultures. His Harvard
colleague Randall Kennedy, a law professor, has written of ``interracial
intimacies'' -- and how love should override ``race'' in matters including
adoption. There
is value in preserving distinct religions and cultures; members of particular
groups can take pride in their shared histories. But proponents of such
preservation should be secure enough to accept hybridization, too. Cultures
can both continue and create fruitful mixtures. Indeed, genetic diversity has
biological as well as social value. As historian Charles Mann notes, ``Few
things are more sublime or characteristically human than the
cross-fertilization of cultures.'' It's
not just conquest that makes us mestizos, to borrow the Latin American term.
Trade, education, language, music, food, sport, fashion, electronic media --
each contributes to cultural exchange. Family plays an especially profound
role. Four
decades ago, the Supreme Court ruled, in Loving vs. Virginia, that laws
against interracial marriage were ``odious to a free people.'' Mr. and Mrs.
Loving prevailed, and with them the cause of progress. Loving vs. intolerance
is God's way, whatever your race or religion. My wife
and I have a baby daughter, a U.S. citizen who joins the surging population
of multiethnic, interfaith Americans. Two percent of Americans over the age
of 18 describe themselves as multiracial; that figure doubles for those under
18. Growing acknowledgment of pluro-cultural realities -- which aren't new --
promises to mitigate the narrow, corrosive zeal with which members of
specific groups sometimes defend their identities. The
demographic blend trend should not diminish awareness of the discrimination
that certain populations have endured. Affirmative action is a necessary
transitional measure to equal opportunity and respect for every person. The
experiences of former African slaves and their descendants are singular. Jews
have suffered hostility over millennia; maintaining the Jewish religion and
culture understandably demands care. Chinese and Japanese Americans faced
exclusionary immigration laws and even internment. They and others overcame
decades of bigotry. We shouldn't forget these Americans' struggles. But
remembering history, and moving beyond it, aren't mutually exclusive. The
melting pot metaphor still resonates, with love heating the pot that economic
opportunity and social liberty have shaped. Our
daughter will celebrate the Muslim holiday Eid and the Hindu festival Diwali.
She will experience Christmas dinners and Passover seders. Her grandmothers
speak to her in Urdu and German, as well as English. Countering
fundamentalist dogmas, the emerging generation will see the flourishing of a
humane, eclectic individuality. This ethos is what philosopher Kwame Anthony
Appiah calls ``rooted cosmopolitanism'' -- an alloy stronger than any
contrived cultural purity. There
is enough hatred and terror on earth. Military and economic strength are
insufficient in combating these backward-looking dangers. ``Soft power''
matters, as national security specialist Joseph Nye reminds us. Love is
a form of soft power. It is a force for freedom. Its advance can help bring
not only people, but also peoples, together toward peace. |