An April 23  panel on New Haven municipal finances touched briefly on the Fire Department and possible regional solutions to fiscal and other
                  problems.  Cost control, property taxes, state payments in lieu of taxes (PILOT), education and job training, transportation,
                  housing, and economic development as a route to new jobs and tax revenues are all part of this conversation.  Regionalism
                  – where it makes sense and where it does not – deserves more thoughtful attention.  
                   For example, New Haveners would be curious to know which/whether other
                  municipalities in the region might be interested in gradually contracting over time to have our Fire Department – with
                  its fixed equipment costs, highly trained personnel and potential economies of scale – handle certain services. 
                  Given the nature of contracts, perhaps such regionalization could be phased in through attrition of fire positions and facilities
                  in other municipalities.  (West Haven’s alone having three fire departments is recognized as a prime
                  opportunity for efficiency gains.)  Other services, too, could be explored through mechanisms such as the
                  Regional Council of Governments.  What is the balance of trade-offs?  It would be useful to look at
                  what we might do, or not, based on evidence elsewhere.  
 
  The following article (with passages excerpted below and certain of the authors’ illustrative parenthetic endnote
                  references fully listed) explores "lessons learned from regionalization for police and fire services, drawing comparisons
                  to public health":
  Annual
                  Review of Public Health
 Vol. 29: 205-218 (Volume publication date April 2008)
                  
 "Regionalization of Local Public Health Systems in the Era of Preparedness," by Howard K. Koh,  Loris J. Elqura, Christine
                  M. Judge, and Michael A. Stoto
                  http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090907
 
 While the article by Koh, et al. primarily treats public health and emergency preparedness, it includes broader discussion
                  of regionalization, defined as “the addition of a regional structure to supplement local government agencies, which
                  in some instances might lead to consolidation of services or agencies.” International examples are cited from countries
                  such as Canada, which has had “intraprovince regionalization of police services for at least 30 years” and New
                  Zealand, where the Local Government Amalgamation Act of 1989 “decreased the number of local governments by 67%, increased
                  accountability for local government boards, and thus was expected to reduce spending.”
 
 In the U.S, the
                  article notes, “regionalization of services has been proposed to remedy some of the socioeconomic and fiscal disparities
                  between metropolitan areas and outlying areas (26. Mitchell-Weaver C, Miller D, Deal R Jr. 2000. Multilevel governance and
                  metropolitan regionalism in the USA. Urban Stud. 37: 851–76). These proposals first began decades ago when
                  rapid economic and societal change led to metropolitan fragmentation and accompanying suburban autonomy complicated the provision
                  of government services (26). Many scholars voiced concern that ‘proliferation of local governments in metropolitan areas
                  has reinforced segregation by income and race, resulting in unequal provision of local public goods and services’(37.
                  Swanstrom T. 2001. What we argue about when we argue about regionalism. J. Urban Aff. 23: 479–96). By 1970,
                  the United States witnessed growing numbers of regional government systems, as evidenced by 30 U.S. cities merging with their
                  county governments. Factors such as leadership needs, economics, and fiscal inequalities and challenges drove these trends.”
 
 According to the article’s authors, “At least two major factors prompted change toward regionalization:
                  efficient use of resources (e.g., police and fire) and building economies of scale, e.g., wastewater treatment,” which
                  New Haven and three of its neighbors have sought with the Water Pollution Control Authority. 
    The article continues: “In many states, regionalization of fire department resources across
                  local towns, institutionalized since the 1950s, exemplifies efficient use of staff during major emergencies. This successful
                  regionalization of local fire services is in part attributable to the culture of strong neighborly bonds fostered by a long-standing
                  volunteer firefighter system (S. Coan, personal communication). States such as Florida, Illinois,
                  and California currently have formalized, comprehensive mutual aid agreements that delineate individual and
                  joint responsibilities and address key issues such as liability (10. Int. Assoc. Fire Chiefs. 2007. Intrastate mutual
                  aid plans: intrastate mutual aid system anchor states.). In Massachusetts, in the event of firefighter
                  injury, each fire agency assumes responsibility for its own staff regardless of the exact city or town where harm occurred
                  (S. Coan, personal communication). In recent years, accelerated by the events of 9/11, fire service responsibilities have
                  broadened. A proposed National Fire Service Intrastate Mutual Aid System is poised to formalize intrastate coordination. This
                  effort is supported by the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) (10). Furthermore, recent emergencies, such as
                  Hurricane Katrina, spurred at least 14 additional states to pass intrastate mutual aid legislation (8. Emerg. Manag.
                  Assist. Compact (EMAC). 2007. Intrastate mutual aid. http://www.emacweb.org/?150).”
 
 Regarding police services, the authors note “the reality that crime and disease regularly spill
                  over into other cities or towns. Individual police departments that ignore coordination of services with neighboring cities
                  and towns may only exacerbate problems regionally. For example, issues related to drug trafficking can easily overwhelm the
                  resources of a small police department in an individual municipality, requiring support from others (38. Tully EJ. 2002. Regionalization
                  or Consolidation of Law Enforcement Services in the United States. Natl. Exec. Inst. Assoc., Major Cities Chiefs Assoc.
                  and Major County Sheriff's Assoc.).”
 Citing the Tully study, the authors find documentation that in
                  the U.S., “more than 17,000 individual police agencies have in fact consolidated into 1000 regional departments (38).
                  Researchers point to resulting benefits that include more efficient delivery of police services, the ability to share specialized
                  resources (such as crime laboratories and centralized records systems), better-trained personnel with the capacity for more
                  specialized skills (e.g., arson investigation or juvenile units), a lower turnover rate, and higher levels of 24-hour coverage
                  (12. Kenney JP, Adams GB, Vito GF. 1982. Consolidation of police services: an opportunity for innovation. J. Police Sci.
                  Adm. 10: 466–72; 17. Krimmel JT. 1997. The Northern York County police consolidation. Policing: An Int. J.
                  Police Strateg. Manag. 20: 497–507). In particular, the more regionalized structure affords increased levels of
                  training and opportunities for advancement and promotion, which in turn produce better-trained personnel (17). Moreover, consolidation
                  is cost-effective owing to resource sharing and elimination of duplication of efforts. Krimmel compared the operational costs
                  of a consolidated police department for 8 rural towns in Pennsylvania with 8 similar municipal police departments in a neighboring
                  county and found that the former provided equal service at 28% less cost (17). Another study comparing regional and municipal
                  police forces in Ontario, Canada, found that the former was more cost-efficient, had wider police coverage,
                  lower crime rates, and improved police organization and services (20. Lithopoulous S, Rigakos GS. 2005. Neo-liberalism, community
                  and police regionalization in Canada. Policing: An Int. J. Police Strateg. Manag. 28: 337–52).”
                       Still, the authors concede, “other studies have shown contrary
                  results. In England and Wales, because crime remained local, small police
                  services proved to be more efficient and effective (20). In a study of 1159 police services in the United States, smaller
                  departments could assign fewer staff to administrative roles compared with larger police departments (20), thereby demonstrating
                  a more efficient use of staff. Despite further shifts toward regionalization of police services after 9/11, when the federal
                  government created the Department of Homeland
                  Security (DHS) and discontinued subsidies for local police,
                  consolidation encountered barriers (20). Resistance naturally stems from fear of loss of local autonomy because change and
                  consolidation can represent a threat to a community's identity (17). In rural areas, there is a perception that personally
                  knowing the police officers in a town will facilitate assistance in times of need (38. Tully EJ. 2002. Regionalization
                  or Consolidation of Law Enforcement Services in the United States. Natl. Exec. Inst. Assoc., Major Cities Chiefs Assoc.
                  and Major County Sheriff's Assoc.). Thorny legal and fiscal issues include determining appropriate monetary contributions
                  of each municipality to a regional operation, which in turn necessitates strict guidelines to determine fair allocation of
                  funding (17).”
 In public health and other realms, the authors conclude, “Adopting a regional approach
                  could improve efficiency, offering opportunities to avoid duplication, share resources, coordinate efforts with state authorities,
                  and achieve consistency at local, regional, and state levels (2, 22).” 
Connecticut’s system of local control – our 169 cities and towns seem exorbitant except next to New Jersey’s
                  some 560 jurisdictions – of course complicates regional approaches.  Yet costs and service demands
                  increasingly dictate more serious pursuit of regionalism, both within states and among them (see, for example, the Regional Plan Association, Citistates and New England Futures). 
  On regionalization and smart growth in Connecticut,
                  Tom Condon's April 27 Hartford
                  Courant column, "We're Still Not Close to
                  Green," merits attention:
“The magazine
                  Popular Science recently rated America's top 50 greenest cities. How many cities from Connecticut made the list? The correct
                  answer is none, as in zero, nada, bubkes, zilch. . . .”
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/columnists/hc-plccondon0427.artapr27,0,4605117.column 
  Also see:
  1000 Friends of Connecticut
  Environment Connecticut  and ConnPIRG
  Finally, on regionalism, under "Opinion Articles" on this website appear 1996 and 1995 Hartford Courant pieces that may be of interest.
                
               						As Connecticut and New Haven debate criminal justice and the re-entry to society of
                  former prisoners (who sometimes become homeless)-- amid tightening budget constraints -- below are links to several recent
                  articles.
 The New York Times, April 23, 2008  
    American Exception:  Inmate Count in U.S. Dwarfs Other Nations'
                         
 
                  By Adam Liptak
  "The
                  U.S. has less than 5 percent of the world’s population but almost a quarter of its prisoners." 
 The week before, on April 18, Laurence Cohen, a Hartford Courant columnist, wrote about "Jobs
                  For Ex-Offenders." http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/columnists/hc-jobsforcons.artapr18,0,3438290.column 
 The New York Times soon afterward, on April 27, ran this article
                  on Newark:
Seeking the Key to Employment for Ex-Cons     
 
                  By Andrew Jacobs
  "Newark’s
                  two leading problems, crime and unemployment, are intertwined with the plight of the 2,300 men and women who come home from
                  prison each year." 
Tom Condon, another Hartford Courant columnist,
                  wrote this May 4 account, "Recovery Homes Offer A Smarter Path Back":
"Connecticut's prison population hit an all-time high this year, but that wasn't
                  the worst news. The real problem is who is in jail. Nearly 4,000 inmates have a diagnosis of mental illness. Nearly 3,000
                  are in prison for sale of possession of illegal drugs, and most of them struggle with addiction." http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/columnists/hc-plccondon.artmay04,0,926032.column 
 The reading levels of prisoners and ex-prisoners
                  also was one topic at a recent Greater New Haven Literacy Coalition event described here: http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2008/04/post_357.php